More on the 99%
Oct. 23rd, 2011 12:49 pmI just wanted to say that this comment I just received is THE REASON I post about politics; it's a lazy way for me to get educated across a broad spectrum of opinions without doing any legwork myself ;) Really though, I hear this and I go "Oh! Well yeah I'm totally with that!"
Don't believe the hype.
I think the media has given you all the wrong idea. I'm here in New York and I've been down to OWS and follow it regularly.
The media is trying to paint this as a bunch of people complaining that they don't have enough but that's not the point, it's just a symptom of the problem.
The problem is that our government no longer serves the people. They serve corporate interests.
There's a Princeton study done by Larry Bartels and Martin Gilens that shows that policies that are supported by an overwhelming majority of common people are generally not passed whereas policies supported by the top 3% of Americans almost always are voted in. These are the people that are elected to represent the majority and the data shows that they aren't doing that.
In 1981 the capitol gains tax was 48% then it was cut in HALF with one bill to 28% and today it's only 15%!
The majority of the top 1% make most of their money on capital gains, not earned income. Therefore, most of the top 1% are only being taxed 15% on MOST of their income.
And we're worried about the deficit? Politicians are cutting social programs, education funding, regulatory cost, etc. Those cuts directly affect you and I and the rest of the 99%.
Furthermore, today's CEOs are making so much more than the average worker that it's actually hurting our economy. Not only were the banks entirely responsible for the economic crash (and were never penalized for it) but when the middle class shrinks as greatly as it has, that stagnates growth overall. Our economy can't get better if the middle class keeps shrinking the way it's shrinking.
In 1965 the average CEO of a large us corporation made around 24 times the earnings of a typical worker. By 2007 average CEO pay was accelerating toward 300 times typical earnings! In 2007 the average CEO of the 350 largest publicly traded companies made $12million PER YEAR!
America CEOs are paid more than twice as much as ANY other country in the world! The disparity between the wealthy and the rest of us is far higher than any other developed country in the world. We are more along the lines third world countries like Nicaragua in terms of disparity of wealth in this country. In fact, Nicaragua and other third world nations like it are quickly become less stratified than us.
With the amount of ridiculous wealth in the country there is no reason why 75% of the wealth in our country should be controlled by 1% of the population.
THAT is what this movement is about. There are some people who are asking for some unreasonable things (like forgiving all school loan debt) but the vast majority of us here on the ground in New York (and I'm assuming in the other participating cities) we're not asking for hand outs. We're not sitting on the sidewalk whining about how much we don't have. We're fed up with having no influence over our own government despite being 99% of the people in this country.
The only thing about this comment that REALLY makes me wonder if I agree with her or not (as someone who knows little about economics, really, and is not bothering to try to prove or rebut or cite sources) is the last paragraph....I'm torn between the feeling that "sitting on the sidewalks" is not gonna accomplish very much, and something another commenter said to me:
The point is that it doesn't matter who you vote for if they've all got GE in their pocket, that money is what shapes the policy. Not the voice of the voters, which is what a democracy is.
That line really made me stop and go, oh wait what is there but protest at such a point? Even though, as I recently told a friend I'm afraid I've riled on fb, I still have the knee-jerk reaction that it's ludicrous when I see people inviting people to come hear live bands play at the "Occupy Miami Arts and Music festival" so they can "Get their voice heard". Maybe this is one of those things (of which there are many) that I'm gonna gradually work my way around about until I've come full circle.
I still feel like the only way protest movements could possible work in the US to enact the kind of change these people are going for is if it is on the scale it's been in Israel....and like I'm really not sure that's possible here. Or desirable. Revolution. Basically overthrowing the government unless they surrender and reshape everything. I suppose it's a possible alternative to the fall of the empire, which has seemed imminent for quite some time.
As always, feel free to discuss. I am really just thinking out loud.
Don't believe the hype.
I think the media has given you all the wrong idea. I'm here in New York and I've been down to OWS and follow it regularly.
The media is trying to paint this as a bunch of people complaining that they don't have enough but that's not the point, it's just a symptom of the problem.
The problem is that our government no longer serves the people. They serve corporate interests.
There's a Princeton study done by Larry Bartels and Martin Gilens that shows that policies that are supported by an overwhelming majority of common people are generally not passed whereas policies supported by the top 3% of Americans almost always are voted in. These are the people that are elected to represent the majority and the data shows that they aren't doing that.
In 1981 the capitol gains tax was 48% then it was cut in HALF with one bill to 28% and today it's only 15%!
The majority of the top 1% make most of their money on capital gains, not earned income. Therefore, most of the top 1% are only being taxed 15% on MOST of their income.
And we're worried about the deficit? Politicians are cutting social programs, education funding, regulatory cost, etc. Those cuts directly affect you and I and the rest of the 99%.
Furthermore, today's CEOs are making so much more than the average worker that it's actually hurting our economy. Not only were the banks entirely responsible for the economic crash (and were never penalized for it) but when the middle class shrinks as greatly as it has, that stagnates growth overall. Our economy can't get better if the middle class keeps shrinking the way it's shrinking.
In 1965 the average CEO of a large us corporation made around 24 times the earnings of a typical worker. By 2007 average CEO pay was accelerating toward 300 times typical earnings! In 2007 the average CEO of the 350 largest publicly traded companies made $12million PER YEAR!
America CEOs are paid more than twice as much as ANY other country in the world! The disparity between the wealthy and the rest of us is far higher than any other developed country in the world. We are more along the lines third world countries like Nicaragua in terms of disparity of wealth in this country. In fact, Nicaragua and other third world nations like it are quickly become less stratified than us.
With the amount of ridiculous wealth in the country there is no reason why 75% of the wealth in our country should be controlled by 1% of the population.
THAT is what this movement is about. There are some people who are asking for some unreasonable things (like forgiving all school loan debt) but the vast majority of us here on the ground in New York (and I'm assuming in the other participating cities) we're not asking for hand outs. We're not sitting on the sidewalk whining about how much we don't have. We're fed up with having no influence over our own government despite being 99% of the people in this country.
The only thing about this comment that REALLY makes me wonder if I agree with her or not (as someone who knows little about economics, really, and is not bothering to try to prove or rebut or cite sources) is the last paragraph....I'm torn between the feeling that "sitting on the sidewalks" is not gonna accomplish very much, and something another commenter said to me:
The point is that it doesn't matter who you vote for if they've all got GE in their pocket, that money is what shapes the policy. Not the voice of the voters, which is what a democracy is.
That line really made me stop and go, oh wait what is there but protest at such a point? Even though, as I recently told a friend I'm afraid I've riled on fb, I still have the knee-jerk reaction that it's ludicrous when I see people inviting people to come hear live bands play at the "Occupy Miami Arts and Music festival" so they can "Get their voice heard". Maybe this is one of those things (of which there are many) that I'm gonna gradually work my way around about until I've come full circle.
I still feel like the only way protest movements could possible work in the US to enact the kind of change these people are going for is if it is on the scale it's been in Israel....and like I'm really not sure that's possible here. Or desirable. Revolution. Basically overthrowing the government unless they surrender and reshape everything. I suppose it's a possible alternative to the fall of the empire, which has seemed imminent for quite some time.
As always, feel free to discuss. I am really just thinking out loud.